|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 22:23:52 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 25, 2005 22:23:52 GMT -5
the most gorgeous pictues you wil ever see
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:16:33 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 25, 2005 23:16:33 GMT -5
Knock it off with the porn shots, Ghost. Seriously. At least tack a warning on if you can't control yourself.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:36:42 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 25, 2005 23:36:42 GMT -5
Excuse me? Don't you dare acuse me of posting porn. Lets get it straight.
porn
n : creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of NO literary or ARTISTIC value other than to stimulate sexual desire
I find it offensive that you would accuse me of posting porn. Porn is designed to arouse people, it is of NO ARTISTIC value whatsoever.
Those pictures are artistic and gorgeous. Just because theres ' naked people' doesnt make it porn . Grow Up. You're all just too goddamned sensitive, its cenorship.
The human body is beautiful.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:41:25 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 25, 2005 23:41:25 GMT -5
Of course 'naked people' doesn't make it porn. But look at some of those pictures. I'm sorry if I believe that a picture of someone feeling themselves up is porn, and many of those shots are that. Plus there's some random gaudy shots all over. Please.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:43:27 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 25, 2005 23:43:27 GMT -5
Oh, Im sorry. I didn't realize that AROUSED you. I didn't realize that made you all HOT . Because if it didnt, then you have no argument here. If those pictures bother you, I suggest you stop looking at them.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:47:19 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 25, 2005 23:47:19 GMT -5
Don't put words into my mouth. If you had tacked a warning on in the first place, I wouldn't have had to look at them anyway, would I?
|
|
Yumi
dæmian
Human - Yumi ~ Daemon - Eikara (official* cieday - 1/14/05)
Posts: 106
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:48:19 GMT -5
Post by Yumi on Jan 25, 2005 23:48:19 GMT -5
Steph does have a point. Even if nude photos aren't porn in every case - and I'm not saying if they are or not in this situation, because I haven't seen them - it still would have been a good idea to give some kind of warning when you posted the link. That way, no one could click it and then be surprised by what came up. If it had been mentioned that there was nudity involved, then only those who wanted to see it would have, and there wouldn't be an issue to talk about here (unless it's against forum rules to post links to places contaning porn and/or nudity of any kind...I don't know if it is or not).
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:51:35 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 25, 2005 23:51:35 GMT -5
If you read between the lines, you'd see I wasnt putting words in your mouth.
I put up some nude pictures before, so I doubt its a problem, considering this is not porn. Its not extreme in any case.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:52:15 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 25, 2005 23:52:15 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure it is. Lemme check... here.
4. Threads will be locked or deleted if they contain material that isn't appropriate for younger readers (i.e. explicit sex, masturbation, or nude photos). Such conversations can be done through MSN, AIM, or PM.
Nude photos, Ghost. A-DURR.
And not extreme? Psh. Okay, sure...
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 25, 2005 23:56:34 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 25, 2005 23:56:34 GMT -5
Then why wasn't my other thread locked? It was a picture on the thread, not even a link.
A-DURRRRRYOUR WRONG .
And, no they arent extreme. CAn we stop now? This thread was for us openminded people to talk about/admire and appreciate art. If you aren't here to do that , then- why are you here?
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 26, 2005 0:03:03 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 26, 2005 0:03:03 GMT -5
One picture, first off. It had a HUGE warning label, and was probably not very extreme, as it was partial nudity.
And yes, I think I will stop now. Since I posted a vague warning to anyone in my first post, I guess it's all I can do.
And I could ask the very same question to you. In general, of course. It's not like you don't have anyone else to bother exept for the decent people on this forum.
But then... leaving now.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 26, 2005 0:09:34 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 26, 2005 0:09:34 GMT -5
It is sad that you consider yourself decent because you dislike nude pictures. I am sad for you.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 26, 2005 0:18:09 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 26, 2005 0:18:09 GMT -5
Eh, just thought that I'd come back to state that I do like artistic nudity (not often, granted, but ever once in a while). But when nudity is used in a gaudy or sexually offencive way to anyone, then I'm not at all sorry that I don't like it.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 26, 2005 0:22:17 GMT -5
Post by cock of teh walk on Jan 26, 2005 0:22:17 GMT -5
Even some the gaudy ones have their side that you can appreciate, if you see them for what they are. I love ones that play with light and ones where people are put in certain positions, like I saw this one where there were all these crooked trees and the girl was stragically placed...i thought that picture was the shit.
|
|
|
Amazing
Jan 26, 2005 0:23:59 GMT -5
Post by StephXZed on Jan 26, 2005 0:23:59 GMT -5
Each to it's own then, argee to disagree...
|
|